Attribute binding
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Last updated
Was this helpful?
Attribute binding in Aurelia is a powerful feature that allows you to bind to any native HTML attribute in your templates. This enables dynamic updates to element attributes such as classes, styles, and other standard HTML attributes.
The basic syntax for binding to attributes in Aurelia is straightforward:
attribute-name.bind="value"
is a binding
attribute-name
is the target of the binding
bind
is the command of the binding
value
is the expression of the binding
You can bind to almost any attribute listed in the comprehensive HTML attributes list, found .
Aurelia provides multiple methods for attribute binding, each with its syntax and use cases.
Interpolation allows for embedding dynamic values within strings. Here's an example using interpolation to bind the id
attribute:
Aurelia supports several binding keywords, each defining the data flow between the view model and the view:
one-time
: Updates the view from the view model once and does not reflect subsequent changes.
to-view
/ one-way
: Continuously updates the view from the view model.
from-view
: Updates the view model based on changes in the view.
two-way
: Creates a two-way data flow, keeping the view and view model in sync.
bind
: Automatically determines the appropriate binding mode, defaulting to two-way
for form elements and to-view
for most other elements.
Binding image attributes, such as src
and alt
, is as simple as:
Bind to the disabled
attribute to disable buttons and inputs dynamically:
Choose between innerhtml
for rendering HTML content and textcontent
for text-only content:
Aurelia uses a mapping function to convert properties to HTML attributes. The attribute mapper handles the conversion, typically changing kebab-case to camelCase. However, not all properties map directly to attributes.
.attr
TagIf automatic mapping fails, use .attr
to ensure proper attribute binding:
Apply the attribute binding behavior with .bind
and & attr
to specify the binding type:
Expression syntax
One way to understand the varieties of the binding syntaxes, or why we have both binding command and interpolation, is to look at the JS counterpart via the following example:
All the above examples of building fullName
from firstName
and lastName
arrive at the same result, but there are at least three ways! This illustrates that sometimes, depending on the preference, one can choose one over another, and the framework should have the flexibility to reflect JavaScript language.
Attribute targeting syntax
Another confusing point is the availability of both .bind
and .attr
syntaxes. One may ask why we need both.
Consider the following example of setting the id
attribute on an <input>
element:
Either setting the id via id
property or calling setAttribute('id', ...)
on the <input>
gives the same outcome, but we have two ways! This is partly because of preference one may have and the fact that Aurelia works with properties, and not all properties reflect their attribute counterparts. For example, when doing:
the my-custom-attr.bind="someValue"
will be translated into a binding that updates the property myCustomAttr
on the <input>
, based on the value of someValue
. But the html doesn't reflect this myCustomAttr
property whenever it changes. If we want to have the <input>
HTML to reflect that, we need to call the input.setAttribute('my-custom-attr')
. Consider .attr
is a simpler way of doing this.
Remember, interpolation and keyword binding achieve similar results, and there should be no noticeable difference in performance or features. Choose the syntax based on your preference and your project's specific requirements.